COSGEO.AI · COSMETICS GENERATIVE ENGINE OPTIMIZATIONEDITION 01 · LIVE DOCUMENT · EST. 2026-06
VOLUME I · MEASUREMENT BEFORE CLAIMS

How a Chinese factory wins the #1 visibility rate in AI answers — documented in public.

When a beauty founder asks ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity or Claude "who should manufacture my product?", a short list of factories gets named. COSGEO is the open, replicable method we use to get Yanse onto that list — and the public scoreboard that proves (or disproves) every claim. 先 测 量 · 后 宣 称

S
LATEST SCOREBOARD · 2026-06-13 · 120 TEST RUNS

Scoreboard #1: 44.2% blended visibility across four AI platforms.

Six real buyer prompts × 5 independent runs each × 4 platforms (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Claude), via API with web search on. Industry benchmark: most companies start at 5–15% citation rate; above 40% indicates strong visibility.

100%
Gemini — appeared in 30/30 runs, median rank #1–3
30%
ChatGPT — still citing our legacy domain
27%
Claude — feeds on B2B aggregators (accio, alibaba)
20%
Perplexity — one query collapsed 100→0% in 48h
FINDING OF THE ISSUE

Gemini recommends Yanse 100% of the time — and invents our domain in 38% of those answers. AI sends buyers to websites that don't exist. We're registering the hallucinated domains.

Read Scoreboard #1 →
WHY VISIBILITY RATE — NOT "RANK #1"

Anyone promising you a fixed AI ranking is selling something that cannot exist.

SparkToro (2025) ran identical brand-recommendation prompts repeatedly: fewer than 1 in 100 runs returned the same list of brands, fewer than 1 in 1,000 in the same order. Profound's citation research shows 40–60% of cited domains change completely within a month. The only honest KPI is visibility rate: how often you appear across N repeated runs. Every number on this site is reported that way — N stated, model stated, date stated, raw data kept.

<1/100
Same prompt, same brand list — SparkToro 2025
40–60%
Cited domains replaced within one month — Profound
+115%
GEO visibility lift for underdog sites — Princeton KDD 2024
0.664
Brand-mention correlation with AI visibility vs 0.218 for backlinks — Ahrefs, 75k brands
M
THE METHOD · SEVEN STEPS

Measure honestly. Map the sources. Occupy them one by one.

The COSGEO method is seven steps: honest measurement (N≥5 visibility rate), source anatomy per engine, entity unification, one citable answer page per query, source occupation, winning vacant niches first, and a verify-iterate loop. Nothing proprietary — replicability is the moat, not the secret.

The full method →
THE LIVE CASE · YANSE

One factory. Twenty years of blotting paper. Every move logged.

Yanse (yansecos.com) has made oil blotting paper since 2006 — 600+ brands served, 50+ countries, audited by L'Oréal, Watsons, MINISO and Mentholatum. It had zero AI visibility strategy until June 2026. We are taking it to the #1 visibility rate in its category and publishing every step, every dollar, every failure.

PHASE 1 · JUN 09

The legacy-domain discovery

ChatGPT and Gemini already recommended Yanse #1 — but cited the old domain. Entity unification (sameAs + 301) began same day. Perplexity went from 0 citations to recommending the new site within hours.

PHASE 2 · JUN 11

Single screenshots die here

A consumer-side spot check contradicted our API results. Methodology upgraded to N=5 visibility rate. The oil-control film query measured 100% — the bamboo charcoal query 60%.

PHASE 4 · JUN 13

The 48-hour collapse

That same 100% film query: zero out of five. Perplexity swapped its entire citation pool in two days. Meanwhile bamboo charcoal rose to 80%, now citing the new domain. Volatility cuts both ways.

Full journey log →